Author: Anthony U. Battista

Anthony represents air carriers, manufacturers and other aviation related entities in complex litigation arising from consumer and commercial transactions. He is lead counsel to numerous airlines, lessors and operators dealing…

View Anthony's Profile

Subscribe to receive email notifications when new items are published

Federal Court Rules that Montreal Convention Delay Claims From Multiple Flights Cannot Be Certified as a Class Action

The issue of whether delay claims brought under Article 19 of the Montreal Convention can be certified for class action treatment under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has gained…

Read More

Ninth Circuit Permits Baggage Delay Class Action To Continue Based on Breach of Contract

The Ninth Circuit recently reinstated a class action against US Airways for the return of baggage fees in the event of delay.1 This holding is notable because it narrowed the…

Read More

Northern District of Illinois Severely Limits Passenger Class Action Delay Claim

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois recently limited plaintiff’s passenger delay class action in Shabotinsky v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG.1 Plaintiff alleged that he was delayed flying…

Read More

The Seventh Circuit Issues Its Second Opinion Questioning the Enforceability of EU Regulation 261 in U.S. Courts

On February 2, 2016, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued its second opinion rejecting passengers’ efforts to obtain compensation for flight delays under Regulation EC (No) 261/2004 (“EU 261”)…

Read More

Supreme Court’s Ruling Limits the Effectiveness of Rule 68 Offers of Judgment in Class Action Litigation

Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a defendant to make an offer of judgment to resolve the plaintiff’s claims prior to trial in a specified amount.…

Read More

ECJ Further Narrows When Technical Problems Qualify as EC 261 “Extraordinary Circumstances”

On September 17, 2015, the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) issued its latest interpretation of European Union Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (“EC 261”). In van der Lans v. KLM, Case…

Read More

Seventh Circuit Affirms – EU 261 Is Not Judicially Enforceable Outside the Courts of the EU Member States

Between September 2013 and June 2014, six district court judges tasked with determining the enforceability of European Union Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (“EU 261”) by United States courts unanimously agreed…

Read More

US Supreme Court Rules that Class Action Defendants Need Not Submit Evidence of Amount in Controversy When Removing Under the Class Action Fairness Act

The Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) affords federal courts original jurisdiction over class action lawsuits that meet the following three requirements: 1) the class has more than 100 members; 2)…

Read More

The Last District Court Judge to Determine the Enforceability of EU 261 in the US “Joins the Chorus” in Holding that a Direct Claim for EU 261 Compensation Cannot be Brought in US Courts

On June 18, 2014, District Court Judge John A. Tharp of the Northern District of Illinois decided the last of six separate motions filed by airline defendants to dismiss a…

Read More

Court Rules that the ADA Impliedly Preempts Claims for EU 261 Compensation from Being Adjudicated in U.S. Courts

On February 12, 2014, Judge Thomas M. Durkin became the third district court judge to hold that U.S. courts cannot enforce so-called “direct claims” brought under European Union Regulation EU…

Read More

Condon Newlsetter Subscribe

Subscribe to receive email notifications when new items are published. Your information will not be shared, and you may unsubscribe at any time via the link in our emails.

Name
Email(Required)
Privacy(Required)